She chose photography.
When she started out, she filtered all the colors out.
“Black, white, shadow, space” she said. There was a stark simplicity in the blacks and whites, the straight lines which could be only one of two polar things. If not one, it was the other. Her trees seemed taller, her flowers more austere, her men more severe, her women more beautiful. Simple. Life was simple then.
Shads of grey crept in, complicating the oversimplification. What was the need for the greys? Well, her subjects move sometimes, and the greys captured the turn of the head, the tilt of the chin, the arm raised for a dance, the swirling skirts, the rustle of the leaves.
Yet when people asked her why she never used color, she could not answer. She could not think that way. Color was a vulgarity, an extravagance. So much colour all around you, does it not distract you from looking straight at the core of things, where lies but one truth? The two dimensions of black and white were too much to describe the one truth she saw.
Yet ask her why there is so much colour in her photographs now. Ask her why there is a spectrum…not just sharp blues and greens and reds, but subtle mauves and magentas and butter yellows and candyfloss pinks? Why there is so much of ‘vulgarity and extravagance’ as she put it? Maybe there is some truth in all that complexity? Maybe the truth is to be seen as a picture, in its entirity, and not resolved into blacks and whites?
-suchitra-
